> [Original Message] > From: Eric Yost <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 11/14/2005 8:20:59 AM > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete's Role Reversal > > Far from defensive, it's offensive on ourselves. > > > You miss the point. Or maybe you just read too much into what > I've written. > > The point is that if we wish to fight terrorism, it's a defensive > war, no matter how we prosecute that war. > O.K., if it doesn't matter how we prosecute the war, then let's flail our arms. We're doing that anyway in Iraq, so obviously it doesn't matter what we do. > The only other alternative is to do nothing and allow the > terrorists to hit us again and again while not responding in any way. > We flailed our arms the expensive way, and the terrorists are hitting again and again. And when they get here, as even Bush says they will, we can add another "again". > Obviously I don't consider surrender an option. Do you? Are you > ready to become a Muslim and adopt sharia law? > Flailing around in Iraq proving our powerlessness has done what exactly? Don't you think the mightly U.S. should have won by now? Instead, the military has said it's impossible to win militarily. Are you listening? The military has said it's impossible to win this war militarily. The oil spot approach has failed in Fallujah. So we took a detour and wound up in the same place, looking for other options. > So (1) respond, (2) don't respond, and (3) surrender. Which do > you choose? What's your solution other than telling everyone how > bad things are? > For starters, waking up that there is a problem. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html