Friday, November 11, 2005, 1:57:52 PM, Eric Yost wrote: EY> That sums it up. As I wrote to Judy a couple days ago, the worst EY> mistakes of the US troops resemble the day-to-day strategy of the EY> insurgency. It took me a while to find the post you mean. I didn't answer that part of it because of the context - see below -- I will now EY>Judy: what happened to "we're better than the terrorists"? EY>Eric: We are. EY>Judy: which is why "we" rant on about their disgracefully doing >what "we" do? EY>Eric: Judy, c'mon, if we were like them, the war would be over. EY>When, for instance, do we deliberately strike at random >civilians? If we did, all the civilians would be dead. All the >mosques would be ash. All the schools would be dust. Every >hospital would be a crater. >What you mean to say, perhaps, is that our worst mistakes >resemble their intentional day-to-day strategy. as my posts have shown (/as they have attempted to show), I'm attacking the "we're better/they're worse" defence in that "we" are supposed to be better than they are, and not just marginally better. My previous posts have explained/tried to explain this point, I now give up (again). -- Judy Evans, Cardiff, UK mailto:judithevans1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html