From: "Phil Enns" <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Andy Amago wrote:
"Okay, so now we know what his intention wasn't. But what was his intention?"
Phil replies:
For the sake of this thread, it is immaterial.
No, it's not immaterial. It's totally on point. It was YOU who made it the point:
Quote from Phil:
Codswallop. The difference in intentionality regarding the deaths of civilians is a qualitative one and to ignore it speaks volumes.
You said that intention was all the difference. It speaks volumes.
Well, so far, it's spoken zero.
yrs, andreas www.andreas.com
------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html