[lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- From: Robert Paul <robert.paul@xxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:43:31 -0800
White phosphorus shells, and napalm, terrible as the latter is, are not
illegal weapons. In my experience, white phosphorus is used as a way of
marking a target or an aiming point, but that is pretty clearly not the
use here. There is a smoke shell that is better than white phosphorus at
screening. (I don't know if it's bombs or shells or mortar rounds that
are in question.) For those fascinated with military arcana, here is
what FM 6-30 (Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for Observed Fire) has
to say:
4-16. SHELL WHITE PHOSPHORUS
Shell white phosphorus (WP) has four uses: incendiary, marking,
obscuring, and screening. It can be used to destroy the enemy's
equipment or to limit his vision. It is used against the following:
* Vehicles.
* Petroleum, oils and lubricants (POL) and ammunition storage areas.
* Enemy observers.
Also, shell WP can be used as an aid in target location and navigation.
It can be fired with fuze time to obtain an airburst.
4-17. SHELL SMOKE
Shell smoke is a base-ejection projectile that is filled with canisters
containing smoke. It is more effective than WP as a screening agent,
because it lasts longer and has less tendency to pillar. The direction
of the wind must be considered in the use of any smoke shell (WP or
hexachloroethane [HC]). Further employment considerations are in Chapter
6, Section IV.
ROME (Reuters) - U.S. forces in Iraq have used incendiary white
phosphorus against civilians and a firebomb similar to napalm against
military targets, Italian state-run broadcaster RAI reported on Tuesday.
Robert Paul
The Reed Institute
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- From: Judy Evans
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Willie Pete
- From: Andreas Ramos
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- From: Eric Yost
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
Robert Paul The Reed Institute ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- From: Judy Evans
- [lit-ideas] Willie Pete
- From: Andreas Ramos
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete
- From: Eric Yost