[lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- From: "Andreas Ramos" <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 10:37:24 -0700
There's lots of speculation over why this memo was leaked.
It's possible that Blair had it leaked to relieve political pressure after the London
bombing.
Or it could be the conservatives again, trying to humiliate Blair's resolve.
Or Blair is trying to force Bush to start talking about withdrawal.
Too bad nobody does political cartoons anymore. It'd be time for "the light at the end of
the tunnel" cartoons.
yrs,
andreas
www.andreas.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- From: Judith Evans
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- From: William Ball
- [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- From: John McCreery
- [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- From: Robert Paul
- [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- From: John McCreery
- [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- From: Andreas Ramos
- [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- From: Paul Stone
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- From: Judith Evans
- [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- From: William Ball
- [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- From: John McCreery
- [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- From: Robert Paul
- [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- From: John McCreery
- [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- From: Andreas Ramos
- [lit-ideas] Re: Why us?
- From: Paul Stone