[lit-ideas] Re: Why philosophy?
- From: wokshevs@xxxxxx
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, John McCreery <john.mccreery@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:59:20 -0230
I find that there is much here that repays careful reflection and analysis. But
why JM subsequently describes himself as a "professional sophist" remains a
mystery to me. As we have no privileged self-access to our self-attributions,
attempts at resolving the mystery are certainly open to all and welcomed.
Walter O.
MUN
Quoting John McCreery <john.mccreery@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Why is it that I chose to major in philosophy, way back when? Why is it that
> I hang out here, making a nuisance of myself picking away at philosophers'
> arguments?
>
> Professor Paul suggests that philosophy is an activity. Walter O. describes
> that activity as
> *
> **a transcendental form of inquiry into the apriori conditions necessary for
> the
> possibility and limits of specific discourses and competencies.*
>
> I see grounds for agreement here. To me philosophy is the kind of thinking I
> do with the angle of the lens through which my mind's eye peers set to the
> widest possible angle. Philosophy is rooted in perennial questions: Who or
> what am I? What am I doing here? What should I be doing here? How can I
> know? The history of philosophy records a long conversation in which very
> smart and determined people struggle with these questions, proposing answers
> broad enough to encompass both themselves and the world in which they find
> themselves. Since philosophers are only human, their answers are always
> partial. Whatever the answers are, they are to other philosophers, either
> incomplete or mistaken. Problems are always left unsolved. Thus the
> conversation continues.
>
> Why study philosophy? No other conversation provides the breadth of
> perspective that this one does. Other disciplines zoom in on their special
> subjects. This one steps back and asks, how do these details fit into the
> bigger picture, the one we try to comprehend as we struggle to answer those
> perennial questions mentioned above?
>
> Philosophy, I would argue, has never been more important than now, this
> Internet age when trying to keep up with what is going on is like trying to
> remain standing in the jet from a fire hose. Where else can we learn to
> recognize and make our own the great, perennial ideas that shape all sorts
> of conversations, whatever the specific topic at hand?
>
> As a pragmatist and professional sophist, I can't live without it.
>
> John
>
> --
> John McCreery
> The Word Works, Ltd., Yokohama, JAPAN
> Tel. +81-45-314-9324
> http://www.wordworks.jp/
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Why philosophy?
- From: John McCreery
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Why philosophy?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Why philosophy?
- [lit-ideas] Why philosophy?
- From: John McCreery