[lit-ideas] While the cat sat on the mat, Wittgenstein ...
- From: Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:14:19 EDT
In a message dated 4/27/2009 5:00:29 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx writes:
A "process" metaphysician -- a'la Alan Watts or
Father Teilhard -- might choose to see all nouns
as verbs. In the sense that the earth "peoples" or
apple trees "apple." Cats are really "catting"
... i.e., the universe producing a cat form. Even
mats might be an indirect expression of natural
forces.
The catting sat on the matting.
Similarly in "It's raining." Es regnet. What is
doing the raining? What is that "it"? There is
rain, not as noun but as verb.
-----
Perfect.
When I did my PhD in Buenos Aires I used "the cat is on the mat" a lot,
but I tell you in Spanish it does not rhyme. "Cat Sat On The Mat" is even
more perfect.
The example I took from what's his name Toulmin, originally, compleat with
drawing.
-----
Now the verbing of nouns is indeed a natural move -- while still in the
realm of symbolism. Famously, Quine said Pegasus pegasises (in "On What There
Is"): he used American spelling and used 'pegasizes'. In any case, just to
tease logicians. For logicians before Quine:
Pegasus flies -- would be Aa.
I.e., still an _atom_, involving a constant of an individual ('a') and a
predicate ('flies'). Quine wanted to say that individuals are the old
pre-Humean substance and thus to be avoided "like the plague" (commis
plaguibus).
In his symbolism, it's two predicates then:
x pegasizes
x flies
In Conception of Value, by Grice, I took inspiration for a casual remark
he makes. "If you ask what tigers are here for, in this earth, I'd say, they
tigerize. Whatever their final _metier_ is, that's what 'tigerise' is".
So indeed, catting and matting.
------
I think Wittgenstein and Russell misuse 'atom' in _atomism_. They want to
say that Aa, say, is an atom. Also perhaps ~Aa. (i.e the negation, "The cat
did not sat on the mat").
One philosopher, R. M. Martin, called his cat, actually, "Pegasus", just
to tease Quine who would say that 'Pegasus' is a _vacuous_ name.
It's only with "Aa & Bb" that we get the first _molecule_ for Wittgenstein
and Russell.
When we 'conjoin', or disjoin (The cat sat on the mat or didn't, you know)
or conditionalise ('if the cat sat on the mat, clean it').
"If the cat is on the mat, clean it" became the butt of jokes for
philosophers like P. M. S. Hacker (who almost succeeded Grice at St. John's,
Oxford).
For, if it is an atom that Aa, then it's also another atom, "Clean it",
but with a different direction of fit. Now in what way is that a conditional
order?
Wittgenstein denied atoms with imperative force, wisely, in his universe
of discourse. Perhaps he would have understood them as "I desire that you
clean the mat", which _is_ a fact.
JLS
**************Access 350+ FREE radio stations anytime from anywhere on the
web. Get the Radio Toolbar!
(http://toolbar.aol.com/aolradio/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown00000003)
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] While the cat sat on the mat, Wittgenstein ... - Jlsperanza