[lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims?
- From: "Phil Enns" <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:04:26 +0700
John McCreery wrote: "It is clear that Phil has never been an ethnographer or historian." Well, I hope it is clear that at least I am doing neither ethnography nor history. John continues: "The assumption that there is some moral quality that transcends the historic and ethnographic is a working hypothesis." Calling this a 'working hypothesis' is a bit of an understatement. The same 'working hypothesis' that makes possible the study of moral acts across time and cultures is what makes the disciplines of history and ethnography possible. If such a transcending is not possible, then neither is history nor ethnography, so we are a wee bit beyond 'working hypothesis' here. John then suggests: "Why not a series of "thefts," analogous to Wittgenstein's games, with family resemblances that link A to B and B to C, while A and C have nothing in common?" I am quite happy with this analogy, with one minor objection regarding John's phrasing, and don't understand how John sees it as an objection. It may be that the card game, solitary, is very different from hockey, nevertheless both are understood as examples of games. Of games one can say that there are rules, and that the game is played according to these rules. One can say that there are players who are playing the game and those who are not playing. One can say that there is a point where a game begins to be played and a point where it is no longer being played. So, actually some things can be said about what makes a game possible all the while allowing that games A, B and C have only family resemblances. This is analogous to everything I have been saying about morality. What counts as theft will differ over time and cultures, but there is at least one thing that can be said about every case of theft, about what makes stealing wrong, namely the imperative "Don't". Sincerely, Phil Enns Yogyakarta, Indonesia where you can't throw a stone without hitting an ethnographer, which given the ethnographers I have met, may not be a bad thing. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims?
- From: Eric Dean
- [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims?
- From: John McCreery
- [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims?
- From: Eric Dean
- [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims?
- From: Phil Enns
- [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims?
- From: John McCreery
- [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims?
- From: Phil Enns
- [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims?
- From: John McCreery
- [lit-ideas] Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims?
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Eric Dean
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Phil Enns
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Eric Dean
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Phil Enns
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Phil Enns
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Phil Enns
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Phil Enns
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Phil Enns
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Eric Dean
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Eric Yost
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Phil Enns
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Phil Enns
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Phil Enns
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Phil Enns
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - wokshevs
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Eric Yost
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - wokshevs
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Richard Henninge
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Phil Enns
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Walter C. Okshevsky
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Walter C. Okshevsky
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Univocal philosophy as the value of transcendental claims? - Walter C. Okshevsky