--- Phil Enns <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > However, the world does not separate out, does not > say, '? ? ?' as > being a state of affairs or an arrangement of > things. That is what we > do when we say 'This is called three dots in a row' > and point > accordingly. So when we see '? ? ?' it is that > "arrangement of things > in the world" along with the English sentence 'This > is three dots in a > row' that makes it possible to say, "It is not true > that there are four > dots in a row". A straightforward solution that > drops out unnecessary > causes like that mythological 'non-linguistic > entity'. *Chair is no doubt a linguistic entity. To make the statement: "I'm sitting on a chair." I need to have the concept of chair, to know the English word for chair etc. Yet if the linguistic concept of chair were all I were sitting on, the statement wouldn't be true because I would find myself on the floor. Perhaps that could help to convey why we cannot reduce everything to language and why need some non-linguistic entities or realities. O.K. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html