Tuesday, September 6, 2005, 11:19:47 PM, Teemu Pyyluoma wrote: TP> It is not only misery. It is throughly depressing no TP> matter how you look at it. You can pick pretty much TP> any thing you thing that is wrong with USA, or modern TP> societies in general and it fits the disaster: TP> - The growing poverty. TP> - Racism. we are a profoundly unequal society (though not as unequal as the US) and inequality is growing here and social mobility falling. But our infrastructure is better (perhaps simply because we are smaller) TP> And so on. Personally, I'm still wondering whether the TP> concept of public emergency shelters is entirely alien TP> to the state of Lousiana or USA in general? I think not. But they are though not an alien concept here, not in place: they were part of Home Defence (formerly Civil Defence) plans in the event of nuclear war, but the plans were not implemented. (We must though have plans -- in fact, we do, of course -- that come into play in the event of a terrorist attack.) TTP> tennis courts, etc. in normal situations) or in TP> basements of houses (used as saunas for the apartment TP> complex). There are some structural requirements, but TP> the basic thing is that they must have a toilet, a TP> shower and spare water. I've never paid any attention TP> to how this is handled elsewhere, but surely the TP> concept is not novel. It's not like it has any TP> significant costs either. Such plans are of use only in certain circumstances -- and really the shelters would need to have air seals, air filtration. There are shelters like that here, the MOD etc. will have them. I doubt their use in time of flood. -- mailto:judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html