[lit-ideas] Re: Top 100 Public Intellectuals...
- From: Paul Stone <pas@xxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:37:42 -0400
At 10:09 AM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
Dawkins' opinions have a scientific basis. Other scientists without a
religious agenda agree with him. Hitchens has opinions.
Yes... I know Andy. That was precisely MY point!!!
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Top 100 Public Intellectuals...
- From: Andy Amago
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Top 100 Public Intellectuals...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Top 100 Public Intellectuals...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Top 100 Public Intellectuals...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Top 100 Public Intellectuals...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Top 100 Public Intellectuals...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Top 100 Public Intellectuals...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Top 100 Public Intellectuals...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Top 100 Public Intellectuals...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Top 100 Public Intellectuals...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Top 100 Public Intellectuals...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Top 100 Public Intellectuals...
Dawkins' opinions have a scientific basis. Other scientists without a religious agenda agree with him. Hitchens has opinions.
- [lit-ideas] Re: Top 100 Public Intellectuals...
- From: Andy Amago