John McCreery wrote: "I wonder, though, if there doesn't come a point at which pointers to this or that example and "Don't think, but look!" becomes evasion, what lawyers would call unresponsive to the question." Of course this happens. As Robert noted, it has become a catch phrase. That aspects of Wittgenstein's thought have been turned into cant doesn't lessen the importance of Wittgenstein's encouragement to understand how things are by looking at particular cases. The hard work lies in teasing out the significance of those particular cases, and some people are lazy. John continues: I press Phil a bit, if Freud, Levi-Strauss and Derrida are exemplary of the differences you see between psychology, anthropology and philosophy, could you please spell that out a bit?" Levi-Strauss sees the universal nature of the incest taboo as a challenge to his structural account of societies and isn't quite sure what to do with it. Derrida sees Levi-Strauss's struggle with this exception as a sign of an internal contradiction within a structuralist approach to understanding. The former is anthropological, the latter philosophical. Sincerely, Phil Enns Yogyakarta, Indonesia ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html