[lit-ideas] Re: Thursday book review -- long


Phil: I mention these two writers because Gilmour doesn't seem in person to be
the same as his television, or perhaps literary, persona while Richler
is very much the same.  A question for those who know such things: To
what degree do writers fit the character of their literary works?

There is a definite fragility that you mention behind the 'manness' with most of Gilmour's characters. It's funny, I've never met him, but I definitely imagined him to be just as you described him. I also have [thankfully] not met D. Richler because he seems like an insufferable jerk ALL the time to me. Richler has stylized messy hair, Gilmour's is just messy because he's messy. I also don't think Daniel is a very good writer at all. He has most definitely achieved a lot of what he has done just from having a famous daddy.


Again, thanks to Paul and I think I might have a go at some of Gilmour's
books.

I'd recommend "how boys see girls" and "lost between houses" as a good way to feel him out.
For an interesting departure, see "An Affair with the Moon."


Paul

##########
Paul Stone
pas@xxxxxxxx
Kingsville, ON, Canada


------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: