--- On Sat, 6/12/08, wokshevs@xxxxxx <wokshevs@xxxxxx> wrote: > From: wokshevs@xxxxxx <wokshevs@xxxxxx> > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: The meaning of life > No, logically contradictory statements cannot both be true > in "real" life or > any other kind of life characterized by rationality. Nor > can they both be > false. > It's just another one of them transcendental things. I don't have any objection to this apart from the claim that this is something "transcendental". It seems to me it is rather that 'logical space' (in Wittgenstein's TLP sense) cannot contain _both_ of certain kinds of object - namely, both the 'object' posited by a proposition and its negation. 'Empirical space' also obeys the rules of 'logical space' or, at least, cannot contradict them - that is, it is empirically impossible (just as it is logically impossible) that at the _self-same_ point in space and time 'x' there is both a swan and an emu. It appears that Aristotle stated this. If there is to be an attack on this long-held orthodoxy it might be best coming from modern maths and physics, where some theorists seem to think something can be two things at once [e.g. a particle and a wave] and so on. Whether such an attack is valid is something that is unclear to me, especially as there is an apparent divide between those physicists who accept the apparent contradictions between Einstein's theories of big things and his theories of tiny, quantum things (accept because both theories are so successful within there own domain) and those (like Einstein himself) who take the position these apparent contradictions need to be resolved within a more general unified field theory. Donal London ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html