[lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- From: "Judith Evans" <judith.evans001@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 18:17:00 +0100
Ah. Another La Rochefoucauld person. (_Maximes_ was one of my first year
university texts.)
Judy Evans, Cardiff, UK
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Geary" <atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2008 11:47 AM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
I don't know who David Wright is, but many of his statements have a
Rochefoucauld flavor to them. Maybe he's French, I decided, and (like Andy)
writes under a mysterious pseudonym. So I googled up David Droit --
nothing. So I tried David Tout Droit -- again, nothing. Discouraged, I
quit. He could be English for all I know.
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- From: David Wright
- [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- From: Mike Geary
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- From: David Wright
- [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Realpolitik -- a rant
- From: Mike Geary