[lit-ideas] Re: The Wittgenstein Tautology -- as identified by Torgeir Fjeld
- From: Ceridwen Harris <cmharris@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:54:11 -0500
Does body language speak?
Ceri
At 09:45 AM 29/03/2004 -0500, you wrote:
>In a message dated 3/29/2004 8:07:53 AM Eastern Standard Time,
>Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx writes:
>It amounts to:
> That of which we can NOT speak, we can NOT speak.
>So, could it read:
>
>That of which we can NOT speak, we . . .
>
>Elliptically,
>Eric
>
>PS: Or would that be a reformulation of "That of which we can NOT speak, we
>also can NOT write"?
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
>digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: The Wittgenstein Tautology -- as identifiedby Torgeir Fjeld
- From: Steven G. Cameron
- References:
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] The Wittgenstein Tautology -- as identified by Torgeir Fjeld
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The Wittgenstein Tautology -- as identified by Torgeir Fjeld
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The Wittgenstein Tautology -- as identified by Torgeir Fjeld
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The Wittgenstein Tautology -- as identified by Torgeir Fjeld
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The Wittgenstein Tautology -- as identified by Torgeir Fjeld
- [lit-ideas] Re: The Wittgenstein Tautology -- as identifiedby Torgeir Fjeld
- From: Steven G. Cameron