[lit-ideas] Re: The Wittgenstein Tautology -- as identified by Torgeir Fjeld

From: Scribe1865@xxxxxxx
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:45:05 EST

In a message dated 3/29/2004 8:07:53 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx writes:
It amounts to:
     That of which we can NOT speak, we can NOT speak.
So, could it read:

That of which we can NOT speak, we . . . 

Elliptically,
Eric

PS: Or would that be a reformulation of "That of which we can NOT speak, we 
also can NOT write"?


------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Follow-Ups:

[lit-ideas] Re: The Wittgenstein Tautology -- as identified by Torgeir Fjeld
From: Ceridwen Harris

[lit-ideas] Re: The Wittgenstein Tautology -- as identified by Torgeir Fjeld

Other related posts: