[lit-ideas] Re: The Vacuity of Truth and Knowledge
- From: Robert Paul <rpaul@xxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:09:35 -0800
F. P. Ramsey, who was a colleague of Wittgenstein at
Cambridge used to say that all claims to knowledge and
truth are vacuous. His theories were ignored in Cambridge
(also, he died). In the famous "Bristol conference" (see
Warnock, "Bristol Revisited") there was a meeting of
the Aristotelian Society.
Nowhere does Ramsey say such a thing. He does though believe that
although the _word_ 'true' seems hard to get rid of in ordinary
language, that to say
'..."it is true that Caesar was murdered" means no more than that Caesar
was murdered, and "it is false that Caesar was murdered" means that
Caesar was not murdered.'
[Symposium: Facts and Propositions, F. P. Ramsey; G. E. Moore,
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, Vol. 7,
Mind, Objectivity and Fact. (1927)*, pp. 153-206.]
*'The Semantic Conception of Truth,' was published in 1944, in
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Very truly yours,
Robert Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- References:
- [lit-ideas] The Vacuity of Truth and Knowledge
- From: Jlsperanza
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] The Vacuity of Truth and Knowledge
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The Vacuity of Truth and Knowledge
F. P. Ramsey, who was a colleague of Wittgenstein at Cambridge used to say that all claims to knowledge and truth are vacuous. His theories were ignored in Cambridge (also, he died). In the famous "Bristol conference" (see Warnock, "Bristol Revisited") there was a meeting of the Aristotelian Society.
- [lit-ideas] The Vacuity of Truth and Knowledge
- From: Jlsperanza