[lit-ideas] Re: The Strident Voice of Defeat

Lawrence has no answer?

Ursula Stange wrote:
Lawrence, you're seeing things that aren't there. What in Mike's note (below) prompted this response? You accuse us of knee-jerk reactions, but who's really jerking here? 
US

Lawrence Helm wrote in response to Mike G.:
Now you guys who don’t like or defend Saddam Hussein are back to defending him. 


-----Original Message-----
From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Geary 
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 10:26 PM
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: The Strident Voice of Defeat


I agree with you, Lawrence. Copy that sentence and frame it! And, of
course, you recognize that people have the same right to believe in Islamism 
as in Christian Evangelism and in Islamic Fudamentalism as in Christian
Fundamentalism. Belief is no crime. Only acts are crimes. Only those who
commit crimes are our enemy, not those who cheer on the criminals (I cheer on bank robbers), or wish they were themselves criminals, only the people 
who commit crimes are criminals. It makes the world more complicated, I
agree. But it separates us from the barbarism of people like Saddam Hussein 
who would kill not just those who tried to assassinate him, but all his
family as well.
Mike Geary
Memphi 



------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: