[lit-ideas] Re: The Mr. Nice Guy Strategy
- From: Andy <mimi.erva@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:04:16 -0700 (PDT)
Never mind, I get it. You didn't mean it literally. We're on the same page.
Sorry about that. I kind of wish you had set me straight...
Andy
--- On Thu, 7/23/09, Simon Ward <sedward@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Simon Ward <sedward@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: The Mr. Nice Guy Strategy
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thursday, July 23, 2009, 10:35 PM
Eric: "See, that didn't hurt. You agreed"
Irony? Woosh! Straight over the head.
The problem I have, the ever lasting problem, is the consequence of draconian
resolve; it doesn't provide any reward for good behaviour beyond a notion of
survival and after that a good proportion will want revenge for draconian
action. In contrast, Mr Nice is in a position to offer a good time to anyone
who behaves.
Discussion point: Did Reagan succeed with Gorbachov because he threatened
imminent destruction or because he talked. Did that simple fact - talking - do
the stuff?
Simon
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts: