[lit-ideas] Re: The Monster is dead
- From: JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 18:30:41 EST
I must be writing obliquely, at best. The problem I find with your position
is that if monsters create monsters create monsters there is a world of
monsters without a way to step outside of that "place". After all, a monster
isn't going to do good parenting. But more than that, it seems that you want
very much to paint people into black & white corners. You are starting to
remind me of Camus. There really is no good in your world, it seems. No
wonder
I am "Pollyanna" to you. You state wonderful ideals -- parents guiding
children w/out spanking them, people treating one another as real human beings
--
and yet in the same breath you assert that such a thing is not possible on
this planet in this species. Cynicism is the flip side of idealism, I
realize. But to assert that Joy is possible and simultaneously that it is not
....
I'm thinking a few swims with schools of dolphins would cheer you.
Julie Krueger
========Original Message========
Subj: [lit-ideas] Re: The Monster is dead Date: 12/31/2006 5:07:20 P.M.
Central Standard Time From: _aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(mailto:aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To: _lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) Sent on:
If there is no cause and effect, what is there? Maybe theologically
something came of nothing, but on planet Earth, by definition effects have
causes.
I also said over and over that victims create victims. Saddam was created,
along with all the other monsters. I hear you saying there is no cause, no
effect, things just happen, let's just sweep it all under the rug, perhaps
rejoice that a monster [read: a once terrorized child] is now dead. I don't
understand that at all.
-----Original Message-----
From: JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx
Sent: Dec 31, 2006 3:48 PM
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: The Monster is dead
Thank you. I needed a laugh today. You wouldn't believe the reaction I
would get from people who know me if I told them I'd been referred to as
Pollyanna. If you read my post a little more clearly, I wasn't saying there
aren't
monsters out there. I have grieved more than I care to share with the
cyberspace world over so many monsters -- distant, long or soon gone, and
personal. And I did not intend to imply that everything is cool. I merely
was
attempting to address the cause & effect basis of your theory, wondering about
the
logic of it. Where monster's come from is a logically fallacious reaction
to my post. One does not easily counter a flaw in their logic by suggesting
that a better explanation be put forth. I doubt the list is interested in a
theological or philosophical dialogue on where monsters come from. Again,
that would not solve the problem of the chicken and the egg notion you seem to
clutch so strongly. The more I consider it, your position is pretty much a
blame-game. Another hand I've played strongly over the years. But it rarely,
if ever, is successful or useful.
For whatever my two cents aren't worth,
Julie Krueger
------------------------------------------------------------------ To change
your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off),
visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
