Eric wrote:
But rather than get sidetracked by historical revisionism of Vietnam, think of WW2 versus Iraq. Although public opinion was solidly against entry into WW2, opinion changed as we went into it. The Marines sometimes lost more troops in a day than we have lost in the entire Iraq conflict, including civilian and mercenary casualties, and yet we kept on plugging through the Pacific.
If we had the WW2 level of public support for the Iraq invasion, no one would doubt that we were winning, having suffered only a few thousand casualties. So given the limits of military power, I think national morale (in a liberal democracy) is key.
See http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-215099
I'm not sure what Eric means by 'winning' in Iraq.
Robert Paul Reed College
------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html