[lit-ideas] Re: The Da Vinci Plague

> > Does anyone else think it's quite ridiculous that two guys who wrote a
'non-fiction' book are suing Dan Brown for plagiarism because he used the
same [historical] events they wrote about in his DVC? Maybe it'll turn out
that THEIR book is fiction afterall.


It isn't accepted fact, it's conjecture.   "Non-fiction" but not fact.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Eric" <eyost1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 10:33 PM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: The Da Vinci Plague


> > Does anyone else think it's quite ridiculous that two guys who wrote a
'non-fiction' book are suing Dan Brown for plagiarism because he used the
same [historical] events they wrote about in his DVC? Maybe it'll turn out
that THEIR book is fiction afterall.
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: