[lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST
- From: Eric Yost <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:30:50 -0400
Objections: (1) There is nothing in the concept of God to establish that "Godly knowing" is in any way similar to human knowing. There is likely nothing to be said about God or what we presume to be attributes of God. (2) Theology outlined in the JOHN (which Faust is reading when Mephistopheles approaches) can be construed to mean that all times happen at once; in other words, because we are "in time," we are blind to the ever-present and singular aspect of time. Because God, in this version of God, sees all time as a single moment, there is nothing to prevent a change in the past or to deny the ongoing perfection of what happens. This view contrasts eternity (being outside of time) with infinite arrow-of-time (one damned thing after another).
Enjoying negative capability, Bonzo ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST
- From: Donal McEvoy
- [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST
- From: Donal McEvoy
- [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST
- From: veronica caley
- [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Mike Geary
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - veronica caley
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Andy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - cblists
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Andy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - veronica caley
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Andy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - veronica caley
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - cblists
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Walter C. Okshevsky
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - carol kirschenbaum
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Mike Geary
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Mike Geary
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Eric Yost
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - carol kirschenbaum
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Ursula Stange
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - carol kirschenbaum
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Ursula Stange
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - carol kirschenbaum
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - veronica caley
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - veronica caley
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - veronica caley
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - veronica caley
- » [lit-ideas] TUESDAY'S FORCAST - veronica caley
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Eric Yost
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Eric Yost
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Walter C. Okshevsky
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Walter C. Okshevsky
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - veronica caley
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - cblists
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Eric Yost
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Mike Geary
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Simon Ward
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Mike Geary
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Simon Ward
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - John Wager
- » [lit-ideas] Re: TUESDAY'S FORCAST - Simon Ward