Steve wrote, "Where does Lawrence stand on this? We haven't heard from him in awhile." This requires two different responses: the second one first: I have been working on a number of writing projects in the last few years (off and on, obviously) and have resolved to attempt to publish something in 2007; which requires that I abandon as much procrastination as possible. I have temporarily abandoned foreign affairs for literature -- read a bio of Hawthorne and am reading one of Melville -- just to keep in the mood. As to my stand on TV humor, I don't purposely watch any sitcoms. I haven't watched Seinfeld, Fawlty Towers or even the cartoon that everyone watches. I would probably find them all funny but try not to get hooked. The last humorous series I got hooked on was "Buffy the Vampire Slayer," but quit telling people the writing was clever and funny when they, typically, called me "sick." BTW, Buffy didn't have a laugh-track. Lawrence -----Original Message----- From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Chilson Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2006 1:05 AM To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: T'AINT FUNNY, MCGEE On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 00:02:21 -0600, "Mike Geary" <atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > > John Cleese, as Basil Fawlty, plays a bigoted, vicious, mean-spirited, > sexist, sycophant. He hates his life, he hates his wife, he hates his > workers, he hates women, he hates his customers, he hates everyone and > everyone but himself and in every program he is brought low by his blind > ambitions, bigotries and human failures. Does Fawlty Towers really have to be explained? Where does Lawrence stand on this? We haven't heard from him in awhile. Is John Cleese a limp-wristed liberal and thus no matter what he does, it isn't funny, but a sick pandering to terrorists? That is where the humor lies in > every program. Everyone else in the show proves themselves much more > adroit, adept, and admirable than Basil Fawlty, but he, being Basil, > never > recognizes that. He is the joke brunt of every program and never knows > it. > And we find it funny. Why? Well, I submit, because we all recognize > parts > of ourselves in him. Each and everyone of us has a Basil Fawlty inside > us. > Hate him though we may, he is partly us. What can you do then but laugh? > Even you, you say, do that. > > > > > I assume by freewheeling judgments you think it's fine to hit ('spank') > > children and it's someone's right to take drugs when pregnant and all the > > rest of it. > > Your assumptions are wrong. What have I ever said to suggest that? Only > your freewheeling judgments could have posited such. Pay attention. > > > > Personally, I can't figure out why it's domestic violence if > > the wife gets hit but it's not domestic violence when a child gets hit. > > Personally, I can't figure out why either is not considered assault and > battery. > > Mike Geary > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html -- Steve Chilson stevechilson@xxxxxxxxxxx