A lurker sent me the following review of the subject movie: http://www.libertyfilmfestival.com/libertas/?p=1659 The review pans the movie, but the responses to the review are also interesting and put it in perspective. The reviewer takes on the whole super-hero genre and not just Superman, but some of the responders argue convincingly that many of the earlier movie heroes were super-heroes as well. I have occasionally ordered some movie or series I watched as a kid and have invariably been disappointed. I can recall going to the Saturday matinees and seeing Serials that struck me as tremendously exciting. I ordered several of them not so long ago and found them awful. I haven't been impressed with any of the modern Superman, Batman, Shadow, Phantom, Daredevil or Spiderman movies. I have to watch all this junk because I liked the comic books when I was a kid, but maybe I'll skip Batman Returns. . . The animation in the Hulk was interesting but not the acting or story line - IMO. Someone for reasons unclear seems to have recommended reading The Constant Gardener. I have in the past been enough interested in a movie to read the book it was based upon, but The Constant Gardener doesn't fall into that category. Lawrence