[lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer
- From: Donal McEvoy <donalmcevoyuk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 21:40:16 +0100 (BST)
Now just imagine we are looking through a hole-in-the-paper. It may not be as effective but it saves trees. Donal Who wonders whether for his birthday David would like a house, a tank, the opportunity to demolish a house with a tank, or that baseball cap somebody was wearing. ________________________________ From: Julie Krueger <juliereneb@xxxxxxxxx> To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sunday, 13 May 2012, 20:03 Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer I like very much the hole-in-the paper exercise. I think I'll use it this week with some of my language & writing students. Julie Krueger On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 1:46 PM, David Ritchie <profdritchie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: When "off" and "on" blur together, sometimes I wonder whether a well-defined job delivering the mail would be a fine thing. And then I remember Charles Bukowski on the subject and my own experiences as a consumer. For want of seven cents recently--there was a rise in price I missed--the post office confiscated my letter, held it ten days, returned it to my box. By this time my brother-in-law's birthday was two days away, and since he lives half a world away and doesn't "do" e cards there wasn't much possibility that he'd be amused or cheered on the right day. I thought of creating a fuss in my local post office, but when I got there a couple were having a loud argument in the parking lot, one fit for t.v. (which may have been where they learned the moves), and that was enough to put me off. I paid the missing seven cents; they re-sent. The card arrived in nine more days, which was first class. Meanwhile, I ordered some nineteenth century books and an up-to-date, backlit reading device. The first were to come by "media mail," the second was regular. None arrived on time. My current theory is that our guy leaves packages for his relief, allows them to cluster. Why do all that heavy lifting when you have seniority? Sure enough, these two packages and another all arrived on POET'S day, Friday, which is I believe when our guy goes fishing, or writes laconic stories. (Piss Off Early, Tomorrow's Saturday). > > >An exercise proposed by a candidate for a job teaching writing at our college >consisted of tearing a hole in a piece of paper to create a window on the >world, a point of view, a frame for observations. We were asked to take a few >minutes then to write what we could see and what we thought about what we >could see. Here's me, "My point of view is not still. When I am god-like and >above the top of the frame I see stains and smudges on the table, marks, >variance in value. These do not mean much to me. What a crap pen this is. > Now I scrunch down. Another of these crap pens comes into view, or rather >the black and round end is what I see, also about a quarter of an inch of >whiteness. When I really get low, I see Arvie [African-American] eating his >lunch from a white, ceramic container. None of this is accidental. I choose >the point of view, and in that selection I refuse other possibilities. So now >I wonder about connections. I spy a white slip of paper, a white stain on the table, possibly left over from an attempt to use white-out. Ah, in the distance, yet more white. My points of view and what I see..., it's all really quite white. He's asking us to put our pens down. No more might for me, or this pen." > >David Ritchie, >Portland, >Oregon------------------------------------------------------------------ >To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, >digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html >
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer
- From: John Wager
- [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer
- From: David Ritchie
- [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer
- From: David Ritchie
- [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer
- From: Julie Krueger
- [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - carol kirschenbaum
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - cblists
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Ursula Stange
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Mike Geary
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Veronica Caley
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Mike Geary
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - carol kirschenbaum
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Eric
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Mike Geary
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Judith Evans
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Judith Evans
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Lawrence Helm
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Mike Geary
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Lawrence Helm
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Lawrence Helm
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Julie Krueger
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - John Wager
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Eric Yost
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - cblists
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Eric Yost
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Eric Yost
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Eric Yost
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Eric Yost
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - cblitid
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - John Wager
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Ursula Stange
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Walter C. Okshevsky
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Julie Krueger
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Eric Yost
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - Julie Krueger
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Sunday Twofer - David Ritchie