[lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- From: "Mike Geary" <atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 08:30:49 -0500
LH:
>>He [Esposito] concluded the Islamic Threat to be myth just as you and Andreas
>>do.
I never said whether I thought it was a serious threat or not. Don't put words
in my mouth. I simply refuted your assertion that it's an either - or
situation. I do think that Bush's war in Iraq is seriously increasing the
threat, and if you think the threat is a serious one, then you should certainly
be opposing this war. From my perspective failure to do so is giving aid to
the enemy, tantamount to treason. Are you treasonous, Lawrence?
>>Hast thou not heard of David Horowitz?<<
Who hasn't heard of Horowitz? Who cares what Horowitz has to say?
Reading your list of dislikes about America would lead one to believe that
you're a conservative. Are you a conservative, Lawrence?
>>As to your references to "brutal, vicious, violent culture," I would ask
>>"compared to what?"<<
Why would you ask that? I wasn't making a comparison to any other country, I
merely accused our country of being brutal, vicious and violent and I don't
like that about America.
>>Some Europeans are learning that the Islamists have a patent on "brutal,
>>vicious and violent."<<
The US is responsible for the deaths of between 150,000 to 600,000 Iraqis
because Bush wanted a base in the Middle East. Tell me who has a patent on
brutal, vicious and violent.
Mike Geary
Memphis
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- From: Lawrence Helm
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Stasi on our Minds
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- From: Mike Geary
- [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- From: Mike Geary
- [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- From: Mike Geary
- [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- From: Lawrence Helm
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Stasi on our Minds
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- From: Mike Geary
- [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- From: Mike Geary
- [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- From: Mike Geary
- [lit-ideas] Re: Stasi on our Minds
- From: Lawrence Helm