"Lawrence Helm" writes: : This is a multi-part message in MIME format. : : ------=_NextPart_000_001F_01C63A28.EDADEFE0 : Content-Type: text/plain; : charset="US-ASCII" : Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit : : Wikipedia can be contributed to by anyone, it is therefore to be used with : caution as the sponsors of Wikipedia advise. I read the article Peter : Junger quoted and found I disagreed with some of it. Several of his points : are wrong according to the authors I've read (see a recent response to : Andreas and Mike for some of the major titles). : : : : So I checked Wikepedia and the article I found didn't match the one Peter : Junger posted. Here is the one that came up when I asked for information : about Islamism: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamist> : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamist . The subject was what is the common definition of "Islamism". I quoted the Wikipedia's entry on Islamism. The passage that you cite is not about the term "Islamism". I will however happily admit that there is no common definition of Islamism. That there is such a thing is your claim, not mine. -- Peter D. Junger--Case Western Reserve University Law School--Cleveland, OH EMAIL: junger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx URL: http://samsara.law.cwru.edu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html