[lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- From: Robert Paul <rpaul@xxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:11:11 -0800
Theorectical statements about language are about as useful as
theorectical statements about the natives of unknown lands. Language
isn't a logical set. Logical rules work for some statements, but not for
others. If a statement is illogical, it doesn't mean it is wrong. Logic
can be within language, but language is not within logic.
I wonder if we could have an example of an illogical statement—? Or or
'language philosophy.'
Just wondering, really. So far all we've got is creeping fescue.
Cheers,
RP
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- From: John McCreery
- [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- From: Andreas Ramos
- References:
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- From: John McCreery
- [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- From: Andreas Ramos