[lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- From: David Ritchie <ritchierd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:29:04 -0800
On Nov 29, 2007, at 4:54 AM, Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx wrote:
gr-ass: thing that gr-ows.
gr-een: colour of the thing that gr-ows.
In English, etymologically, grass (as we have Central Park to prove
that) cannot be BUT green. So we need no Tarski axiom for that,
because we can infer the biconditional of any analytically true
sentence.
Well no, because it's not growing all the time. Annual grasses--
native to America--re-seed. Perennial grasses go dormant in the
winter and dry up in the summer. When the grasses are growing they
may be green, but at other times other colors--brown, or seed color--
apply.
David Ritchie,
not mowing a meadow in
Portland, Oregon
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Snow is white, and Grass is green (Collected Papers by Tarski)
gr-ass: thing that gr-ows.
gr-een: colour of the thing that gr-ows.
In English, etymologically, grass (as we have Central Park to prove
that) cannot be BUT green. So we need no Tarski axiom for that,
because we can infer the biconditional of any analytically true
sentence.