[lit-ideas] Sentencing
- From: "Julie Krueger" <juliereneb@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 05:09:08 -0500
This is a bit belated consider where the sentencing threads have gone, but I
posted it yesterday and it yet to show up in my in-box, so I'm trying
again.
Juile Krueger
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Julie Krueger <juliereneb@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Jun 5, 2007 9:15 PM
Subject: Sentencing
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Wondering which of the two "sentencing" threads to post this to, I simply
decided to create a third - why not add to the confusion? In any event,
Time has an interesting article on Libby's sentencing -- but it expands to
talk more broadly about sentencing in general. It clarified some things for
me, at least. (Oh, and the whole intent/result thing is addressed in
it....not satisfactorily, but addressed.)
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1628373,00.html?cnn=yes
Julie Krueger
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Sentencing
- From: Andreas Ramos
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Sentencing
- From: Julie Krueger
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Sentencing
- » [lit-ideas] Sentencing
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sentencing
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sentencing
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sentencing
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Sentencing
- [lit-ideas] Re: Sentencing
- From: Andreas Ramos
- [lit-ideas] Sentencing
- From: Julie Krueger