[lit-ideas] Re: Saint Exupery
- From: David Ritchie <ritchierd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:13:19 -0700
On Apr 28, 2008, at 7:53 PM, Robert Paul wrote:
I think Lawrence has given the argument to the best hypothesis.
I find the suggestion that Saint Exupery was inattentive a plausible
explanation. Accounts of air warfare make clear that a moment's
inattention was enough to get a pilot killed. But what do you
(plural) make of this, from Wikipedia's piece on Saint Exupery?
Rippert's story is unverifiable, and has met with criticism from some
German and French investigators.[16][17] It remains unclear why the
fragments that were recovered of Saint Exupéry's P-38 showed no
traces of combat.
Low flying plane, avoiding attack, ploughs into the sea?
David Ritchie,
Portland, Oregon
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Saint Exupery
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Re: Saint Exupery
- From: Eric Yost
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Solomon Grundy born on Monday
- From: Mike Geary
- [lit-ideas] Re: Saint Exupery
- From: David Ritchie
- [lit-ideas] Re: Saint Exupery
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Re: Saint Exupery
- From: Robert Paul
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Saint Exupery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Saint Exupery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Saint Exupery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Saint Exupery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Saint Exupery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Saint Exupery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Saint Exupery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Saint Exupery
I think Lawrence has given the argument to the best hypothesis.
- [lit-ideas] Re: Saint Exupery
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Re: Saint Exupery
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Solomon Grundy born on Monday
- From: Mike Geary
- [lit-ideas] Re: Saint Exupery
- From: David Ritchie
- [lit-ideas] Re: Saint Exupery
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Re: Saint Exupery
- From: Robert Paul