[lit-ideas] Re: SOS or Charles Taylor's Sources of the Self (revised)

  • From: "John McCreery" <john.mccreery@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 20:34:39 +0900

On 5/19/06, Omar Kusturica <omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

One was a seminar paper
on construction of self in John Donne which I never
turned in, another an M.A. thesis on selfhood in
modern minorities literature which I never wrote. I
felt that I didn't know what to look for and that I
couldn't use the term meaningfully in any descriptive,
still less analytic way.

Now that's an interesting admission. Your situation exemplifies the fundamental predicament of modern selves as Taylor describes it. We don't know what to make of ourselves, as "a human agent, a person, or a self." We have no firm answers to the questions: What are my obligations to other human beings? What is it to live a fulfilling life? By what criteria may I deserve others' respect?

Taylor's traditional self is precisely the opposite, a self that knows
the answers to these questions. The specific answers may vary; the
obligations of a woman may be different from those of a man, the
merchant's fulfillment may be different from a farmer's; the respect
owed a warrior may reflect different criteria than the respect owed a
priest. Individuals may fall short on any of these dimensions; they
may not do what they're obliged to do, their lives may fall short of
fulfillment, they may not deserve respect. But the basic answers to
the questions, the reasons by which their success or failure is
judged, are taken to be self-evident.

The answers constitute a framework within which selves are situated
(indeed, I note, borrowing a notion from the anthropologist James
Fernandez, selves might be conceived as points in the
three-dimensional space that the questions constitute). If modern
selves seem vague and slippery, it is because the frameworks that
define them are themselves problematic. Taylor writes (p. 17),

"What is common to [modern selves] is the sense that no framework is
shared by everyone, can be taken for granted as **the** framework tout
court, can sink to the phenomenological status of unquestioned fact."

Why this should be and the path by which it came to be is the central
theme of Taylor's book.

John

--
John McCreery
The Word Works, Ltd., Yokohama, JAPAN

US CITIZEN ABROAD?
THROW THE RASCALS OUT!
Register to Vote in '06 Elections
www.VoteFromAbroad.org
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: