[lit-ideas] Re: Returned Thing
- From: David Ritchie <ritchierd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:54:19 -0700
On Mar 19, 2008, at 8:35 PM, Robert Paul wrote:
David Ritchie writes
I haven't the first clue why "Full Moon" is the stuff, which
bafflement is what I get for piping up, I suppose.
I was hoping for a drive-by explanation and snagged your subject line.
Subject line? Pshaw! Tipton Plimsoll line more like!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_Moon_(novel)
David Ritchie
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Is 'All men are mortal' unscientific?
- From: Donal McEvoy
- [lit-ideas] Re: Is 'All men are mortal' unscientific?
- From: Robert Paul
- [lit-ideas] Re: Returned Thing
- From: David Ritchie
- [lit-ideas] Re: Returned Thing
- From: Robert Paul
- [lit-ideas] Re: Returned Thing
- From: David Ritchie
- [lit-ideas] Re: Returned Thing
- From: Robert Paul
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Returned Thing
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Returned Thing
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Returned Thing
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Returned Thing
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Returned Thing
David Ritchie writes
I haven't the first clue why "Full Moon" is the stuff, which bafflement is what I get for piping up, I suppose.
I was hoping for a drive-by explanation and snagged your subject line.
- [lit-ideas] Re: Is 'All men are mortal' unscientific?
- From: Donal McEvoy
- [lit-ideas] Re: Is 'All men are mortal' unscientific?
- From: Robert Paul
- [lit-ideas] Re: Returned Thing
- From: David Ritchie
- [lit-ideas] Re: Returned Thing
- From: Robert Paul
- [lit-ideas] Re: Returned Thing
- From: David Ritchie
- [lit-ideas] Re: Returned Thing
- From: Robert Paul