[lit-ideas] Qua and Als Ob
- From: jlsperanza@xxxxxxx
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:00:28 -0400
Geary and Paul are discussing philosophy.
A: Why is a cup called a cup
B: Because it is a cup (Q. E. D.)
Paul calls B's assertion "irrefutable" with the implication that it is also
"univerifiable", perhaps.
Geary is interested in the _qua_. I mentioned that but Walter O. ignored
it, and gave us a lesson of things a philosopher does which are _not_
philosophical (e.g. go to the bathroom). I disagree. The hylemorphism is a
unity, and _whatever a philosopher_ does is, 'philosophical'. In this
philosophers are different from dentists.
Anyway, qua is perhaps the most important philosophical term. It's _not_
strictly philosophical. My maid uses it! But 'perseity' only _she_ uses:
the perseity [< post-classical Latin perseitas self-subsistence (c1300
in Duns Scotus) < classical Latin per s by itself (see PER SE adv.),
corresponding to ancient Greek ' , as used by Aristotle, Analytica posteriora
73a26 + -ts (see -TY suffix1; cf. -ITY suffix). Cf. French perséité (1736).]
The
quality of being predicated essentially of a subject; an instance of this.
Also:
the quality or fact of existing independently.
1588 A. FRAUNCE Lawiers Logike sig. ¶3v, And yet, notwithstanding all their
Perseities,..hee that would not gather gould out of Aquinas dregges,..I shall
thinke him as wise. 1694 R. BURTHOGGE Ess. Reason ix. 269 Subsistence is a mode
of Existence, to which it adds Perseity. 1876 Contemp. Rev. 28 1006 One
novelty..in philosophythe exclusion of the per-se-ity and must-be-ity, which
cut
such a figure in what goes for metaphysics. 1912 Jrnl. Philos., Psychol. &
Sci. Methods 9 529 But radical empiricism can yield no metaphysical principle
like the God of scholasticism, of such attributes as unity, aseity, perseity,
infinity, necessity, immutability, etc. 1962 L. VON MISES Ultimate Found. Econ.
Sci. v. 79 In denying perseity, i.e., independent existence of their own, to
the
collectives, one does not in the least deny the reality of the effects brought
about by the cooperation of individuals. 2002 Theol. Stud. 28 854 Neither the
rational nature by itself, nor the perseity (being a per se existent) of
subsistence, can constitute the ultimate specific difference for
personhood.
The Germans regarded that Graeco-Roman compounds were good, but German ones
were better. "Als ob" is a fascinating one that corresponds to Geary's qua si
quid, reading the conditional 'si', as Geary does, as 'as' -- als ob, 'as if'.
E.g. While a chair can have the perseity of a chair, it can be used as a table
(als ob -- i.e. as it were a table). Ditto a philosopher can be treated as if
he
were an idiot, and that is the reading one sometimes gets from McCreery. On the
other hand a publicist can be treated as 'someone living in Japan'.
JL
Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel Guides.
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Qua and Als Ob