[lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- From: Judy Evans <judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 19:14:57 +0000
Wednesday, December 29, 2004, 6:29:36 PM, Veronica Caley wrote:
VC> I read several of these articles including the one you cite. This news
VC> source does not seem to be anything like an objective news outlet, but
VC> rather another arm of right wing propaganda machine, therefore I give i=
t no
VC> credence.
Thank you, Veronica; I have now looked at the site more closely -- yes
-- at first very sleepy glance I thought I was looking at a standard
news site...
VC> Re the UN comment, out of order and undiplomatic.
I think it's worth looking at what Jan Egeland actually said:
>The second stage is for medium and long term help. The UN is holding
> a conference next month to discuss the next steps following
> this disaster. Already the UN's emergency co-coordinator
> Jan Egeland has said this might be the worst natural disaster ever.
> That implies the need for unusually large contributions.
>He is also complaining that rich countries are not giving enough to the
> poor anyway. "It is beyond me why we are so stingy. Really. Christmas
> time should remind many Western countries at least, how rich we have beco=
me," he said.
>"There are several donors who are less generous than before in a growing w=
orld economy."
>He suggested that governments "believe that they are really burdening
>the taxpayers too much, and the taxpayers want to give less.
> It's not true. They want to give more."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4130127.stm
VC> Concerning how much US
VC> government will contribute to Asian relief? Who knows? Mr. Bush's tac=
tic
VC> for several years is to mandate programs, offer money to pay for it and
VC> then greatly reduce it. =20
I think perhaps I'd best be no comment... -- I do have a plea. Both
the US and the UK rely on citizens giving money (of course Bush has
actually admitted this) but that shouldn;t stop peopke who feel they
can give something, doing so. Our Disasters' Emergency Committee,
having raised more than =A340 million for the Sudan, has now launched a
Tsunami Appeal. They already have $5 million - since yesterday and the
appeal hasn't really started -- but, well, the more the better.
Their web page is a bit shaky at the moment (they've had to change it fast)
and I think a lot of people are trying to access it -- still, here it is:
http://www.dec.org.uk/
or people might prefer to give to Medecins Sans Frontieres --
particularly people outside the UK -- they are
already there and will be sending more teams
www.msf.org/
and
www.doctorswithoutborders.org/
NB their web pages are also shaky, too many people are trying to
access them
Judy
--=20
mailto:judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- From: Judy Evans
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- From: Veronica Caley
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities ??
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities ??
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- From: Judy Evans
- [lit-ideas] Re: Priorities
- From: Veronica Caley