[lit-ideas] Re: Potlach etc.
- From: "Judith Evans" <judithevans1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:51:09 +0100
You guys are lucky. Here university depts decide how much
reading per course per week (OK, York Pol decreed it).
That is, they decide/d the (notional) hours. (7 outside class,
David.) Also they decreed that certain pieces of the weekly
reading should be compulsory for all students on a course, the rest,
obviously, merely 'recommended'.
Then the math is simple. If they're
> supposed to spend six hours outside class doing work for that class,
> they can read 360 divided by (x), give or take.
When the regime came in I asked a seminar group (a receptive and amiable
one) to log their reading and report back (promising the results
would not count against them... ). One, a woman RAF officer,
probably, had read 4 books -- not surprising -- some had struggled
to read two articles. There was no feasible mean -- even excluding her,
there wasn't -- I ended up, as I think most people did, making
two articles or two chapters 'compulsory'. Luckily, some students
still did more (and of course some did zero).
> My daughter's professors are still in "ought to be able to" mode.
I'm still in 'ought' but for a reasonable version of 'ought'. But then,
British
students now do need some 'ought' -- as they did when I was still
teaching --
the figures given below are probably an overestimate...
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/education/article2007997.ece
and see http://www.open.ac.uk/Arts/philos/cbbio.htm -- so true
as for
But I was
> actually thinking about those moments when everyone in the class has
> prepared something and the issue is, who shall speak first? Do you
> pick the most eager student? The recalcitrant one? The one at the
> back of the room? The one who is likely to start well?
rare moments, yes?! I think I, like you, chose somewhat randomly.
Judy Evans, Cardiff
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Ritchie" <ritchierd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 7:20 PM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Potlach etc.
>
> On Sep 27, 2007, at 7:57 AM, wokshevs@xxxxxx wrote:
>
>
> > Regarding the matter of dull moments in class:
> >
> > A comment undergrads often make in my course evaluations has to do
> > with what one
> > of them once called "dead air in class." I think this is what
> > Davied refers to
> > below.
> >
>
> Thanks, Walter, for your response. I agree with you absolutely about
> the importance of silence and admitting ignorance. But I was
> actually thinking about those moments when everyone in the class has
> prepared something and the issue is, who shall speak first? Do you
> pick the most eager student? The recalcitrant one? The one at the
> back of the room? The one who is likely to start well? I was just
> saying that after years of thinking about all this, it occurred to me
> (how slow I am) that demonstrating random selection was as good a way
> as any.
>
> One reason I wrote was to encourage those of us who teach to
> contribute tips from time to time; if we are thinking about
> literature and ideas, then surely we must occasionally think about
> how we, as the fellow in "The History Boys" puts it, "pass the parcel."
>
> On the subject of "doing" reading, I have this to contribute. When I
> first began to teach I used to assign amounts of reading that were
> "good" for students. My professors had assigned impossible tasks--
> read four Shakespeare plays this week, four the next, oh and the
> "Faerie Queen," and...--so why not continue the tradition of "ought
> to be able to"? I am now in favor of "is". I now hand out samples
> from the reading and time, in class, how long on average (x) it takes
> students to read a page. Then the math is simple. If they're
> supposed to spend six hours outside class doing work for that class,
> they can read 360 divided by (x), give or take.
>
> My daughter's professors are still in "ought to be able to" mode.
> How about you?
>
> David Ritchie,
> Portland, Oregon
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Potlach etc.
- From: David Ritchie
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Defining the enemy
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Back to the future?
- From: Robert Paul
- [lit-ideas] Re: Test
- From: David Ritchie
- [lit-ideas] Re: The Godwit and the Titi's Vomit
- From: David Ritchie
- [lit-ideas] Re: Potlach etc.
- From: David Ritchie
Other related posts:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Potlach etc.
- From: David Ritchie
- [lit-ideas] Defining the enemy
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Back to the future?
- From: Robert Paul
- [lit-ideas] Re: Test
- From: David Ritchie
- [lit-ideas] Re: The Godwit and the Titi's Vomit
- From: David Ritchie
- [lit-ideas] Re: Potlach etc.
- From: David Ritchie