while i find wittgenstein of very little importance, even more so the 'investigations' tractatus is and ought to be among the gravestones of a great century, great stones, no doubt - as he said, he had a wonderful life - as for post 1999, the Language and Mind, springs to attention On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 4:25 AM, John McCreery <john.mccreery@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > On the *Savage Minds *blog, Matt Thompson has discovered something he > finds interesting. > > The other day I was reading the Wikipedia entry on Wittgenstein when I >> came across a claim that piqued my curiosity, “In 1999 his posthumously >> published Philosophical Investigations (1953) was ranked as the most >> important book of 20th Century philosophy.” The embedded citation led me to >> this– >> Lackey, Douglas P. 1999. “What Are the Modern Classics? The Baruch Poll >> of Great Philosophy in the Twentieth Century.” The Philosophical Forum. 30 >> (4). >> Lo and behold, it’s a journal article. In Wikipedia! It just so happens >> that my library has access to The Philosophical Forum, so I got the pdf to >> check it out. Call it productive procrastination, but I love digression. >> I’m like a kid pulling a thread out of the sand. Where does this lead? >> It was Y2K and Lackey had read a bunch of Best of the Century-type lists >> and had the idea to do one for philosophers. So he emailed 4,000 philosophy >> professors and received 414 replies to his survey. The article includes >> separate rankings for most important book and most important article, with >> light commentary on each entry. It’s quite an enjoyable article, worthy of >> an extended coffee break or unwinding at the end of the day. >> He describes the survey methodology: >> We asked respondents to name the five most important books in philosophy >> in the twentieth century, and also the five most important articles. Giving >> five choices permits discretion, but five is a small enough number to force >> voters to choose their selections carefully. Since we were interested in >> judgments of quality, we instructed respondents to make their choices on >> the basis of intrinsic merit, not on the basis of causal influence. (By the >> causal influence standard, Mein Kampf might be the most important book of >> the twentieth century.) >> … >> We asked respondents to list their choices in order of preference. On >> this score we had little compliance… We decided not to use any point system >> for weighting the results according to preference. We did keep track, >> however of which book was listed first on each ballot, and used that >> indication to break ties. >> Lackey notes that only twenty five books got eleven votes or more, which >> if he took in more than 400 survey responses means many, many books only >> got a few votes at most. In other words, there’s a long tail on this not >> represented in the rankings below. The survey results, Lackey’s top >> twenty-five: >> Total votes/ Total ranked 1st…..Author, Title >> > > >> 179/ 68….. Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations >> 134/ 51….. Heidegger, Being and Time >> 131/ 21….. Rawls, Theory of Justice >> 77/ 24….. Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus >> 64/ 27….. Russell & Whitehead, Principia Mathematica >> 63/ 7….. Quine, Word and Object >> 56/ 5….. Kripke, Naming and Necessity >> 51/ 3….. Kuhn, Structure of Scientific Revolutions >> 38/ 4….. Sartre, Being and Nothingness >> 34/ 16….. Whitehead, Process and Reality >> 30/ 4….. Ayer, Language, Truth and Logic >> 25/ 5….. Dewey, Experience and Nature >> 23/ 0….. Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception >> 19/ 0….. Moore, Principia Ethica >> 18/ 1….. James, Pragmatism tied with MacIntyre, After Virtue >> 17/ 9….. Husserl, Logical Investigations >> 17/ 5….. Husserl, Ideas >> 17/ 2….. de Beauvoir, Second Sex >> 14/ 2….. Hart, Concept of Law >> 14/ 0….. Ryle, Concept of Mind >> 13/ 1….. Goodman, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast >> 12/ 3….. Gadamer, Truth and Method >> 12/ 2….. Parfit, Reasons and Persons >> 11/ 5….. Russell, Problems of Philosophy tied with Quine, From a Logical >> Point of View and Popper, Logic of Scientific Discovery > > > Thinking of favorite topics of conversation on Lit-Ideas, I note > > 1. that we seem to agree with the general consensus that Wittgenstein is > very, very important > 2. that we are constantly discussing only a very small subset of the > authors listed here > 3. that Popper barely makes the cut, in a tie for 24th place, and Grice > does not appear at all > > I also find myself wondering if there has been anything written since > 1999, the year when this survey was conducted, that would find its way into > a top-25 that included the first decade of the new millennium—or even be a > possible entry for a similar survey done, in say, 2049. > > Comments? > > -- > John McCreery > The Word Works, Ltd., Yokohama, JAPAN > Tel. +81-45-314-9324 > jlm@xxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.wordworks.jp/ > -- palma, KZN *יד* וַיַּעַן עָמוֹס, וַיֹּאמֶר אֶל-אֲמַצְיָה, לֹא-נָבִיא אָנֹכִי, וְלֹא בֶן-נָבִיא אָנֹכִי: כִּי-בוֹקֵר אָנֹכִי, וּבוֹלֵס שִׁקְמִים. palma University of KwaZulu-Natal Howard College Campus, philosophy department Durban 4041 South Africa Tel off: [+27] 03 12 60 15 91 Fax [+27] 03 12 60 30 31 admn Y. Hordyk : [+27] 03 12 60 22 92 mobile 07 62 36 23 91 from abroad +[27] 76 23 62 391 EMAIL: palma@xxxxxxxxxx palma's office 280 (3rd flr of Mtb) from 2o12\o7\22 p1o2 - check venues&schedule at ad off- there will be a postgrad offering TBA *only when in Europe*: inst. J. Nicod 29 rue d'Ulm f-75005 paris france ------------------------------ ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *The common base of all the Semitic creeds, winners or losers, was the* *ever present idea of world-worthlessness. Their profound reaction from* *matter led them to preach bareness, renunciation, poverty; and the* *atmosphere of this invention stifled the minds of the desert* *pitilessly. A first knowledge of their sense of the purity of* *rarefaction was given me in early years, when we had ridden far out* *over the rolling plains of North Syria to a ruin of the Roman period* *which the Arabs believed was made by a prince of the border as a* *desert-palace for his queen. The clay of its building was said to have* *been kneaded for greater richness, not with water, but with the* *precious essential oils of flowers. My guides, sniffing the air like* *dogs, led me from crumbling room to room, saying, 'This is jessamine,* *this violet, this rose'.* * * *But at last Dahoum drew me: 'Come and smell the very sweetest scent of* *all', and we went into the main lodging, to the gaping window sockets* *of its eastern face, and there drank with open mouths of the* *effortless, empty, eddyless wind of the desert, throbbing past. That* *slow breath had been born somewhere beyond the distant Euphrates and* *had dragged its way across many days and nights of dead grass, to its* *first obstacle, the man-made walls of our broken palace. About them it* *seemed to fret and linger, murmuring in baby-speech. 'This,' they told* *me, 'is the best: it has no taste.* *Thomas Edward Lawrence, the seven pillars of wisdom, ch.3*