[lit-ideas] Re: Of flying and counting
- From: Eric Yost <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:26:34 -0500
Raven at my in-cawtious post, Donal asserts: as the growing field of
crow cognitive science increasingly recognises, it their ability at
chess that disproves that . . . in tests where the chess pieces are all
pieces of carrion, the crows carry out a very thorough and numerate
inventory at the end of each game to make sure the pieces are properly
divided between them.
Jim Crow laws in chess determine that white pieces are separate from
black pieces until the game is over. While statisticians have shown that
crows prefer Bird's Opening (1. P-KB4 or f2-f4), these same
statisticians assert that crows often run afowl of poisoned pawn
positions, preening themselves on their ability to overcome positional
disadvantage.
It has also been established that they favor rook and pawn endgames.
As for their post-game analysis, it's pretty much the way Donal says it is.
Avoiding the Straw-man argument,
Eric
in rags
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Of flying and counting
- From: Donal McEvoy
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Of flying and counting
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Of flying and counting
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Of flying and counting
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Of flying and counting
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Of flying and counting
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Of flying and counting
- [lit-ideas] Re: Of flying and counting
- From: Donal McEvoy