[lit-ideas] Re: (No References, etc.)
- From: Eric Yost <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 02:32:27 -0400
Yes, but I did get you to argue, in support of
John's hypothesis of argument culture.
You give anti-US stuff like, "It kept African
Americans in slavery for two hundred years and in
economic thrall for another hundred years..."
which is partially true, although it ignores the
Islamic Slave trade, which began much earlier and
carried equally many slaves through the Indian
Ocean and trans-Saharan slave routes. (The
difference being that the Europeans enslaved the
same amount of humans in shorter time.) It also
ignores defining "economic thrall," as though that
were some special privilege of African-Americans.
Yet it does go to the point of passionate argument
culture. Neither Mike or I are strangers to it.
EY
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: (No References, etc.)
- From: Andy
- References:
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Re: (No References, etc.)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: (No References, etc.)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: (No References, etc.)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: (No References, etc.)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: (No References, etc.)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: (No References, etc.)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: (No References, etc.)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: (No References, etc.)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: (No References, etc.)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: (No References, etc.)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: (No References, etc.)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: (No References, etc.)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: (No References, etc.)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: (No References, etc.)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: (No References, etc.)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: (No References, etc.)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: (No References, etc.)
- [lit-ideas] Re: (No References, etc.)
- From: Andy