<<Perhaps the fledgling teen-aged robbers aren't going to be terribly well-armed, but they aren't going to be interested with complying with Nigerian gun control laws. Of course, if they happen upon an unarmed home-owner, they won't need guns. Other weapons will suffice. >> This thread started out because of the VA killings. If Cho had had only "other weapons" (spear, knife, what have you), would he have been able to be as efficient in his killing? Been able to mow down 31 people? The thing about guns, to me, is not that people will be violent and use whatever tool of violence that is available to them, but that guns are very effective killing machines. Put AK47s in the hands of the Nigerians and tell me that wouldn't make a bit of difference in that volatile region. What if every red-blooded American citizen were allowed to purchase shoulder-held missiles? I guess you'd allow that, since it might be the only way to defend one's self against machine guns. What if every red-blooded American citizen were allowed to purchase a small nuke? I guess you'd allow that, since it might be the only way to defend one's self against missiles. Yes, guns kill people, and people kill people. The thing about guns is it makes the people who kill people much more efficient at it. Julie Krueger