[lit-ideas] Re: Nicolas of Cusa's "Coincidentia Oppositoru

  • From: "palma apg 42.71.63.00" <palma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2004 09:51:09 +0200 (CEST)

 which shows that Kant was wrong and that you did not answer the question


f the niotn of god here is regualtive it regulates what?

> Mr. Palma asks "did anyone consider that there is no god, so being 
> noting at all it can be said anything about it" [?]
> 
> 
> Didn't Manny Kant say pure reason was regulative, and when we force our 
> thought to describe transcendental ideas by empirical means, the red 
> TILT button lights up?
> 
> And the idea of God is the unity of ...?
> 
> Eric
> (been a long, long time since I struggled through F. Max M's torturous 
> translation)
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
> 
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: