[lit-ideas] Re: New EU lexicon on terror
- From: Omar Kusturica <omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 21:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
--- Lawrence Helm <lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Having read several books on the European
> predicament, I read every new
> article I come across. Perhaps the EU is developing
> a backbone. Perhaps it
> is now dealing more firmly with the Islamist
> problem. Not in Diana West's
> opinion. [Lawrence]
>
> As they say over there: What rot. Only hothouse EU
> officials could believe
> that words such as "Islamic terrorism" cause
> radicalization. Fanatical
> bloodlust (not to mention 72-virgin-lust) inspires
> acts labeled "Islamic
> terrorism," not the other way around. But not in
> EU-land.
*Ah, the explanatory power or terms such as
"bloodlust." I guess that the critics of the US
government policies should add "bloodlust" to their
analytical lexicon, too.
O.K.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
