[lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- From: Eric Yost <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 22:52:16 -0400
I apologize to Eric, he is certainly not a fascist, but
really what did he think the 'apparently' referred to? What
post*, in
the recent past, had made the connection between Eric and fascism
'apparent'? And when I made light of being called names? I
quoted Eric
being flippant with regards to names he applied to himself, I gave a
name and was equally flip. What the hell did he think that meant?
____
And I apologize to Phil for my nasty reply. Right now, I'm the
one without a sense of humor. It's tough being Hitler.
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- From: Mike Geary
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- From: Phil Enns
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- » [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- From: Mike Geary
- [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- From: Phil Enns