The Bush White House is seriously downplaying this. They don't want an issue. It's easy to determine if it's nuclear or not; any org could go downwind and collect wind samples. yrs, andreas www.andreas.com ----- Original Message ----- From: <JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx> To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 11:23 AM Subject: [lit-ideas] NK blast? > _Click here: CNN.com - North Korea cloud 'not nuke blast' - Sep 12, 2004_ > (http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/asiapcf/09/12/nkorea.blast/index.html) > > _http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/asiapcf/09/12/nkorea.blast/index.html_ > (http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/asiapcf/09/12/nkorea.blast/index.html) > > _BBC NEWS | Asia-Pacific | N Korea blast 'was not nuclear'_ > (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3648794.stm) > > _http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3648794.stm_ > (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3648794.stm) > > This is very peculiar. And the slight differences between the two reports > are not insignificant. John, what are people in Japan making of this? Asia > Times doesn't even mention it. > > Julie Krueger > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html