[lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- From: Robert Paul <rpaul@xxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:13:15 -0800
Walter writes
I can't remember such exchanges. Perhaps if somebody is [able] to jog our memory
we'll also find out if "interesting" was ever defined within the exchanges and,
if so, how. One's position on that issue may go some way in determining one's
views on the other question.
I remember a fairly lengthy dispute (mostly) between Phil Enns and me,
in which Phil argued that there was no such thing as a right
(ontologically, not morally, speaking). This was of course different
from my skirmish with Mike over whether there was any such thing as a thing.
Robert Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- From: wokshevs
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: The sky is falling. No, really, the sky is falling.
- From: Andy
- [lit-ideas] Re: The sky is falling. No, really, the sky is falling.
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] The sky is falling. No, really, the sky is falling.
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- From: David Ritchie
- [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- From: wokshevs
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
I can't remember such exchanges. Perhaps if somebody is [able] to jog our memory we'll also find out if "interesting" was ever defined within the exchanges and, if so, how. One's position on that issue may go some way in determining one'sviews on the other question.
- [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- From: wokshevs
- [lit-ideas] Re: The sky is falling. No, really, the sky is falling.
- From: Andy
- [lit-ideas] Re: The sky is falling. No, really, the sky is falling.
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] The sky is falling. No, really, the sky is falling.
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- From: David Ritchie
- [lit-ideas] Re: Mop Rumpchuck
- From: wokshevs