[lit-ideas] Re: META

This my second of my three (I trust) posts  today. To acknowledge C. 
Bruce's post on yesterday. I'm pleased that he keeps  reading my posts. If so, 
I 
would appreciate any comment on list etiquette could  be referred under this 
thread?

I am interested in reading his and other  listers' comments. But sometimes 
it is misleading (to me anyway) to read a post  on "Re: The Life and Death 
of Wittgenstein" that uses 'exceptionally'  solecistically: just joking!

>I think my meaning was exceptionally  clear.

1866 RUSKIN Crown Wild Olive (1873) 68 So completely and  unexceptionally 
is this so, that [etc.]. 1871 W. G. WARD Ess. Philos. Theism  (1884) I. 50 
That which I have habitually and unexceptionally experienced, I  regard as 
contingent.  

Thanks,
 
Cheers,
 
J. L. Speranza
   Buenos Aires, Argentina
**************Recession-proof vacation ideas.  Find free things to do in 
the U.S. 
(http://travel.aol.com/travel-ideas/domestic/national-tourism-week?ncid=emlcntustrav00000002)
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: