For what it is worth, a Google search for "Shame versus Guilt Cultures" produces a list of 220,000 URLs. The concept was popular in the 1950s and 60s, when it was heavily promoted by anthropologists associated with studies of "culture and personality." It was used at one time to distinguish between Northern and Southern European (or, more broadly, circum-Mediterranean cultures). A quick scan of the google results mentioned above shows that the concept has been picked up and also used to distinguish, for example, European and African cultures. I have heard it applied to Asian cultures as well, e.g., in comparisons of "the West" and Japan. It is one of those binary oppositions that lends itself to all sorts of largely invidious comparisons. In every case, the guilt-laden are supposed to have interiorized universal values to such an extent that guilt is felt over even private transgressions. In contrast the shame-driven are supposed to be unashamed in the absence of public exposure. The guilt-laden are, thus, supposed to embody a higher morality than their shame driven counterparts. John -- John McCreery The Word Works, Ltd. 55-13-202 Miyagaya, Nishi-ku Yokohama 220-0006, JAPAN ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html