[lit-ideas] Is defining wronged by torture?
- From: Eric Yost <eyost1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 15:55:26 -0400
Omar: Please point out which of the terms involved
in this
definition are circular, and which are problematic so
as to require further clarification and thus lead to
infinite regress.
Eric: Donal is citing David Hume's famous
objection to conventional definitions.
Hume noted that defining terms in terms of other
terms merely substitutes synonyms for the term
being defined. This is the "definitional circle"
that leads to infinite regress. It is a well-known
juncture in British empiricism.
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Is defining wronged by torture?
- From: Robert Paul
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Is torture wrong by definition?
- From: Omar Kusturica
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Is defining wronged by torture?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Is defining wronged by torture?
------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- [lit-ideas] Re: Is defining wronged by torture?
- From: Robert Paul
- [lit-ideas] Re: Is torture wrong by definition?
- From: Omar Kusturica